Here's the latest from Matthew Cardinale, the News Editor of Atlanta Progressive News (with my emphasis):EXCLUSIVE: US FY08 Budget Funds Iraq Occupation into 2009
(April 02, 2007)You got that? Amazing! Or is it? Or is it just that we're still not sufficiently jaded?
(APN) ATLANTA – The US House’s Federal Budget for Fiscal Year 2008 also projects $50 billion of spending in 2009 on “Overseas Deployments and Other Activities,” primarily for use in Iraq, Atlanta Progressive News has learned.
US Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) appears to be the only Democrat to have opposed the Budget because of opposition to funding the Occupation; the other Democrats who opposed were Conservative Democrats.
Even progressive Democrats–other than Kucinich–who opposed the Supplemental just a week ago voted yes on the Budget, including US Reps. Lee, Lewis (D-GA), Waters, and Woolsey. Messages left with the Offices of Lee, Waters, and Woolsey were not returned today.
"The President's FY08 budget requests funding for the Iraq war well into 2009 and the Democrat budget accepts that timeline. On the most important issue of our time, we are falling right into line with the President's plan for the war and his requests to fund it," Kucinich said in a press release obtained last week by Atlanta Progressive News.
The press release was also sent to the corporate media, Kucinich’s spokesperson confirmed; however, they all appear to have ignored it.
"The supplemental that just passed the House last week calls for a withdrawal of troops by August 2008. Why does the budget fund the war for perhaps an entire year past the withdrawal date in the supplemental?... If we were serious about trying to stop the war, the budget would not contradict the supplemental," Kucinich said.Did you catch that too? So did I! Therefore, IMVHO, the following steps are immediately required:
US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s (D-CA) Office suggested to Atlanta Progressive News on Thursday the $50 billion could have been for training the Iraqi military or watching US Embassies in Iraq.
Pelosi spokesperson Drew Hammill told APN yesterday that he had checked into it and the funding was indeed for those specific purposes. When asked today why those purposes were not specifically listed in the Budget, Hammill said that those are only possible uses of the 2009 Overseas dollars and referred APN to the US House Budget Committee.
"I’m not going to get into specific purposes because it’s just a Budget, not an Appropriation," Hammill told APN.
"August 2008 is a starting point and not an ending point," he said, referring to the target beginning withdrawal date included in the US House Supplemental.
Pelosi’s Office confirmed it’s a possibility that the US Occupation of Iraq could still be going on in 2009 with the withdrawal only beginning in August 2008.
So when will the troops be finished leaving? "I don’t think you’re going to get an answer to that," Hammill said.
The Budget Committee confirmed APN’s analysis of the bill.
(1) Read the rest of the story here.
(2) Join me in thanking Matthew Cardinale and Dennis Kucinich.
(3) Help put a curse on the rest of the Congress and on the corrupt American mass media.
(4) Pass this story along!
(5) There is no step five.